An integral part of research is outreach and dissemination. I like my papers to be accompanied with a press release, if possible, to make it more visible to the public. Sometimes, what I do is send some materials to the press officer in our faculty and request if a press release can be written on that.
Below you find those materials, which I think could help some interested readers digest some of the information in the paper. This is the official press release from the college: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189232/oxygen-could-have-been-available-life/
This is our recent paper: Early Archean origin of Photosystem II
Summary of the paper
The problem
When or how oxygenic photosynthesis originated remains
controversial. Understanding how and when oxygenic photosynthesis emerged is
fundamental to understand how life has evolved through the long history of the
planet. For example, it is important to understand when oxygen was available to
life for the first time. Oxygen permitted the evolution of aerobic respiration,
which is the main energetic process that powers most life on Earth and it is
essential to sustain the complexity of animals and humans. It is also
important to understand the probability of complex life evolving in other solar
systems. For example, if oxygenic photosynthesis is a very difficult
process to evolve, then the probability of complex life emerging in a distant
exoplanet may be very low.
The controversy is the result of the difficulty of
unequivocally and unambiguously detecting oxygen in the rock record or figuring
out when the first oxygen-producers evolved for the first time.
The older the rocks, the rarer they are, and the harder it
is to prove conclusively that any fossil microbes found in these ancient rocks
used or produced any amount of oxygen.
Today, the oldest known oxygen-producers are called
cyanobacteria. These bacteria became the chloroplast of algae and plants, but
all cyanobacteria that we know of use a very sophisticated form of oxygenic
photosynthesis. So figuring out when cyanobacteria originated does not really
tell us when oxygenic photosynthesis appeared for the first time, but only tells
us when a very sophisticated form of oxygenic photosynthesis was already
possible.
Therefore, it cannot tell us when oxygenic photosynthesis really
got started and what ancestral forms of oxygenic photosynthesis looked like.
What we did
To overcome this difficulties, we studied the evolution of
Photosystem II, nature’s solar panels that use the energy of light to break
water molecules into its components, protons, electrons, and oxygen. Then, if
we can understand when and how Photosystem II evolved the capacity to oxidize
water, then we may have a better idea of when and how oxygenic photosynthesis
got started, even before there was enough oxygen in the planet to leave a trace
in the rock record.
The core of Photosystem II is made of two evolutionarily
related proteins: called D1 and D2, which originated from a gene duplication.
D1 and D2 are very similar to each other at a structural level but they differ
at the basic sequence level, at the amino acid level, or in other words: they
look the same but the basic building blocks have changed. Today D1 and D2 share
30% of the amino acid sequence identity. That means that from the approximately
350 building blocks that make D1 and D2, slightly over a hundred are perfectly
identical between D1 and D2, but at some point in time they were 100%
identical.
Fortunately, the function and structure of Photosystem II
has been studied in great detail, so we can tell from what D1 and D2 look like,
and from the remaining ~100 identical building blocks, that before the
duplication that allowed the evolution of D1 and D2, water oxidation was possible.
Oxygen is a very reactive molecule: that is why it is so
important to life because it can drive many chemical reactions that are
essential to life. Oxygen can also react with chlorophyll leading to the
formation of what is called reactive oxygen
species. These reactive forms of oxygen are very toxic to life. So all
photosynthetic organisms have evolved mechanism to protect against reactive oxygen
species and to prevent oxygen molecules from interacting with chlorophyll. By
comparing D1 and D2 we can also tell that before the duplication, the ancestral
Photosystem II had already evolved mechanisms to protect against damage caused
by oxygen.
What needed to be done now is to find out the span of time
between the duplication event (when D1 and D2 were 100% identical) to the
ancestor of all cyanobacteria, which inherited a standard sophisticated Photosystem
II (when D1 and D2 had left only about 30% identical building blocks).
To do that we need to find out how fast D1 and D2 are changing:
that is, the rate of evolution. We can find out using a technique called
Bayesian relaxed molecular clock analysis. The method uses the power of
statistics and known events in the evolution of photosynthetic organisms from
the fossil record to calculate the rates of change.
The results
We found out that D1 and D2 are evolving at a very slow
rate. The rate is so slow that it would take about 8 billion years for two
identical D1 sequences today to become indistinguishable from each other in the
future. For example, we know that the ancestor of flowering plants and most
algae is more than 1 billion years old, but if I compare D1 in an algae and D1
in the banana tree, they will be about 87% identical. So in more than 1 billion
years of evolution out of approximately 350 building blocks, less than 50 have
changed in all plants and algae. If you compare the D1 in all flowering plants,
which appeared around the time of the dinosaurs, they’ll be over 98% identical:
that is less than 10 changes in more than 130 million years!
It is not strange at all that Photosystem II evolve so slowly:
all complex enzymes that can be traced to the earliest forms of life evolve at
similar rates. Because they fulfil important functions most changes are likely
to result in a worst enzyme than a better enzyme, so most mutations are
naturally wiped out. That is why we can tell that all life on Earth originated
from a single origin, because many of the enzymes important for function have
evolved at a really slow pace so that even after 4 billion years of evolution,
they still look the same and work in similar ways in all groups of life.
We found out that because D1 and D2 are evolving so slowly,
the span of time between the duplication and the ancestor of cyanobacteria is
likely to be over a billion years or more! We cannot tell however with perfect
exactitude when the ancestor of cyanobacteria appeared for the first time, but
if it existed about 2.5 billion years ago, then the duplication could have
easily occurred more than 3.5 billion years ago. The important discovery is that
it does not matter when the ancestor of cyanobacteria appeared, because the
span of time between the duplication (the dawn of oxygenic photosynthesis) and
this ancestor will always be very large.
Another amazing thing we discovered is that even when the span
of time is one billion years, the rate of change at the moment of duplication
had to be about 40 times greater than the observed rates in the past 2.0
billion years. Forty times the current speed of change is about the limit of
what is possible for molecular machines of such level of complexity. In fact,
it is already above any measured rate for these kind of complex, highly
conserved, molecular machines. Then, knowing that, we can calculate that if
this gap of time were to be smaller, the rate at the duplication would have to
be faster, and quickly enough the rates would be so large that they would be
outside the realms of biology.
Imagine a car going from Paris to Berlin, a journey of about
1000 km, it would take about 10 hours to drive such distance at about 100 km
per hour. If we want to arrive in 5 hours, we would need to drive at about
twice the speed, but if we want to arrive in 1 hour, we would need to go at 10
times the speed, at almost the speed of sound. Not possible even for the
fastest Formula 1 car. It is the same for the speed of evolution.
This is also important because it tells us in a very straightforward
manner that evolutionary scenarios in which oxygenic photosynthesis originated
very quickly before the ancestor of cyanobacteria can be ruled out with
confidence. Even if we don’t know when exactly cyanobacteria originated.
The bigger picture
The main implications of the paper is that oxygen was
available to life long before it started to accumulate in the air at about 2.4
billion years ago. This
is in agreement with current geological data that suggests that whiffs of
oxygen or localized accumulations of oxygen were possible before 3.0 billion
years ago.
There has been debates on whether aerobic respiration
evolved before or after cyanobacteria, and therefore before or after oxygenic
photosynthesis. This
is because the enzymes used for aerobic respiration appear to be much older
than cyanobacteria. But how can aerobic respiration have evolved before
oxygen was available to life? In the absence of oxygenic photosynthesis it is
expected that the amount of oxygen available to life would be virtually
negligible. So scientist have had to come up with convoluted scenarios to
explain this. Our data help understand how this is possible, because oxygenic
photosynthesis likely got started long before the ancestor of cyanobacteria.
Today oxygenic photosynthesis is only found in cyanobacteria, but our data suggests
that it is likely that many other forms of microbes that today do not do
photosynthesis may have had old ancestors with the capacity to split-water
using light.
In fact, recent
data hints to the possibility that oxygen was important for the development of
the genetic code, and reconstructions of the
genetic capabilities of the earliest forms of life always retrieve enzymes to
protect against reactive forms of oxygen, but the latter are usually
dismissed as artefacts or anomalies. Our work can help understand how this is
actually possible, because the older cyanobacteria is found to be, the more
likely it is that oxygenic photosynthesis started at the earliest stages in the
history of life and soon after the earliest forms of photosynthesis.
What’s next
We are trying now to bring back to life what the ancestral
photosystem before the duplication looked like using a method called Ancestral
Sequence Reconstruction. This is a well-established method that allows us to
predict the basic building blocks of the ancestral enzyme using the known
variation across all extant species. We cannot travel back in time to 3.0
billion years ago, but we can make the ancestral enzyme travel from the distant
past into our test tube in the lab today.
Because the enzyme is evolving so slowly its structure has
not change too much since its origin, what has changed is the particular
building blocks along the different positions of the preserved structure. That
makes it very suitable system for Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction, or
targeted site-directed mutagenesis, although that does not mean it is easy. Nevertheless,
we have now modified strains of cyanobacteria expressing some of the ancestral
genes and we will soon attempt to validate our predictions experimentally. This
is a three year-project funded by the Leverhulme Trust.
No comments:
Post a Comment